Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

VerifiedVoting.org engages in lobbying activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(4). Please visit the Verified Voting Foundation for info about 501(c)(3) educational activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Take Action  »  Resources  »  Poll Monitors' & Poll Workers' ...


Poll Monitors' & Poll Workers' Guide to Electronic Voting

Tools for Election Protection

The 2004 elections present many voters with the challenge of voting on new and unfamiliar voting equipment. This guide provides poll monitors, poll workers, election officials, and other interested persons with information about voting technology and procedures with a focus on electronic voting machines.
 
You can download this guide (PDF format). It is a companion to the Voters’ Guide to Electronic Voting also published by the Verified Voting Foundation.

Election officials across the United States are facing much pressure to "upgrade" voting technology, especially with the availability of funds legislated for this purpose by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002.

Counties, boroughs, parishes, and even entire states are purchasing digital
electronic recording (DRE) voting machines without a voter-verified paper
ballot (VVPB) capability. A VVPB is a paper ballot that voters can see and
verify that their votes are recorded accurately and stored in a secure ballot
box so that election officials can use the ballots later for mandatory audits and
meaningful recounts.
 
This Poll Monitors’ and Poll Workers’ Guide to Electronic Voting provides poll monitors, poll workers, election officials, and other interested persons with detailed information on the voting machines used in polling places and central tabulation facilities with pointers to how to keep voting technology working successfully and improve elections operations. We also cover how to investigate and get help when something goes wrong with the voting technology.

You can learn what choices voters have available in the jurisdiction where you are working. For example, in California, voters in one of the counties using electronic voting machines have the right to ask for a paper ballot if they prefer. In Hawaii and in Washington, D.C., voters may have the choice of using a paper optical-scan ballot instead of an electronic voting machine.

And in Nevada's Clark County, some of the voting machines will have VVPB and some will not, so a concerned voter may want to wait for the machine that does offer a reliable audit trail.

The more you can let voters, fellow poll monitors and poll workers, and election officials know about the options available in the voting process, the more likely you can ensure that voters can vote and that their votes will be recorded as intended.

Poll Monitors' & Poll Workers' Guide Table of Contents

This Poll Monitors' & Poll Workers' Guide has a variety of sections that you can navigate to directly from here:

site map of the entire website is available to assist you in finding more helpful resources.

Your Participation

As a nonprofit organization with limited resources, we rely on volunteers to help with research for guides like this one, as well as for a variety of other tasks. We are committed to continuous improvement of the materials, so if you see a problem with any of these materials or if you would like to volunteer to do research, data gathering and display or other jobs, please let us know by volunteering at
http://www.voteprotect.org .

Last but not least—and regardless of any problems with voting technology or election processes, procedures, and regulations—please remember to vote and encourage others to vote!

The Verifier Map

How do Americans cast their ballots? See the Verifier Map for detailed information on voting systems used in each state and county in recent elections.

voting equipment used in earlier elections (2004/2006)


Get E-Mail Alerts




Announcements

February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
January 28, 2010
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
January 28, 2010
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective
January 26, 2010
Coalition Supports Improvements for Troop Voting; Rejects Risky Internet Ballot Proposals
January 21, 2010
WV: The Internet is not a secure-enough platform for overseas voters
January 15, 2010
Maryland needs secure, verifiable voting system
December 5, 2009
TN: Voters need confidence in electoral process
December 1, 2009
Election Technology Leaders Launch "The Power To MOVE"
November 12, 2009
Patrick OKs expanded benefits for veterans
November 6, 2009
Plaintiffs Comment on Court Order regarding TN Voter Confidence Act
November 4, 2009
Security expert: no way to secure Internet voting
November 3, 2009
E-voting system lets voters verify their ballots are counted
November 3, 2009
Justice Department Probing Diebold Sale
October 27, 2009
In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code
October 9, 2009
TN: State Division Of Elections Hosts Meeting On Optical Scan Voting
October 6, 2009
Verified Voting Statement on the Acquisition of Premier Election Solutions
October 1, 2009
Common Cause Tennessee Takes Legal Action to Protect Voters
October 1, 2009
Advocates warn of voting-machine 'monopoly'

Important Links

  • Election Workers: Take our 2008 Election Worker Survey
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project



  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    VerifiedVoting.org, Inc., is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, VerifiedVoting.org, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to VerifiedVoting.org.


    Privacy    Site Map