Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version
Site Map

See information for:

VerifiedVoting.org engages in lobbying activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(4). Please visit the Verified Voting Foundation for info about 501(c)(3) educational activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Manual Audit Requirements


Manual Audit Requirements

by Pam Smith and Bob Kibrick

A number of states have enacted requirements for mandatory manual audits (in randomly selected precincts) of the voter-verified paper records produced by the voting systems in use in those states. These audits are designed to verify that the electronic voting systems (either DRE voting machines or optical scan voting systems) are accurately recording and counting the votes. In the randomly-selected precincts, a hand count of the voter-verified paper records is compared to the totals reported by the electronic voting system.

At least two states without voter-verified paper record requirements (Kentucky, Pennsylvania) also have audit requirements. These were written into statute decades ago, apparently prior to widespread adoption of (paperless) direct recording electronic (DRE) voting systems. It is unclear whether -- or how -- these states are carrying out their statutory audit requirement. Texas requires audits of optical scan paper ballot systems only; counties with DREs have no voter-verified paper records to audit.

Verified Voting has compiled a document that lists these mandatory manual audit requirements along with citations of the relevant legislative text. This document is available as a PDF-format document that includes links to the cited legislation.



The Verifier Map

How do Americans cast their ballots? See the Verifier Map for detailed information on voting systems used in each state and county in recent elections.

voting equipment used in earlier elections (2004/2006)


Get E-Mail Alerts




Announcements

February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Holt Statement on NJ Court Decision on Paper Ballots
January 28, 2010
Internet Voting, Still in Beta
January 28, 2010
MD: State elections head says new voting system costly, not effective
January 26, 2010
Coalition Supports Improvements for Troop Voting; Rejects Risky Internet Ballot Proposals
January 21, 2010
WV: The Internet is not a secure-enough platform for overseas voters
January 15, 2010
Maryland needs secure, verifiable voting system
December 5, 2009
TN: Voters need confidence in electoral process
December 1, 2009
Election Technology Leaders Launch "The Power To MOVE"
November 12, 2009
Patrick OKs expanded benefits for veterans
November 6, 2009
Plaintiffs Comment on Court Order regarding TN Voter Confidence Act
November 4, 2009
Security expert: no way to secure Internet voting
November 3, 2009
E-voting system lets voters verify their ballots are counted
November 3, 2009
Justice Department Probing Diebold Sale
October 27, 2009
In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code
October 9, 2009
TN: State Division Of Elections Hosts Meeting On Optical Scan Voting
October 6, 2009
Verified Voting Statement on the Acquisition of Premier Election Solutions
October 1, 2009
Common Cause Tennessee Takes Legal Action to Protect Voters
October 1, 2009
Advocates warn of voting-machine 'monopoly'

Important Links

  • Election Workers: Take our 2008 Election Worker Survey
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project



  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    VerifiedVoting.org, Inc., is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, VerifiedVoting.org, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to VerifiedVoting.org.


    Privacy    Site Map